Wednesday, October 26, 2011

The "Occupy" movement.

So I decided to start out with the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement. It’s current, and somewhat relevant to some of the topics I’d like to discuss, so I thought why not.
First off, I see Occupy Wall Street as a double edged sword. To start, It’s good to see people getting out and voicing their frustrations, both with Wall Street, and with the government. I think the sheer numbers alone are at least enough to make government leadership do a double take (let’s be honest, no one on Wall Street gives a crap). And of course, any press is good press, and they’re getting plenty of that. It seems in between all the other stories on the news, they always have a moment or two to mention the Occupy movement.
The bad side of it all is the muddled message. Watch ten news reports with ten interviews with Occupy participants, and you’ll get ten different reasons why they’re doing what they’re doing. A general protest of the banks, a protest of the banks participation in government, a protest of the governments participation in the banks business. A protest of greed and general corruption. Then there are the people who just have no class. The news has covered them of course, from the defecators to the litter bugs, but truly they seem to be the minority. Most of the protesters have handled themselves very well, even when having their free speech rights violated, for instance, to save a few bushes (side note – this disgusted me. For all intents and purpose, the city of Boston effectively came out and said “we’re sorry, but these shrubs are more valuable than the rights given to you in our constitution.” Absolutely awful)

The other part of it is the non-involved public reaction. A joke pic circulated on the net a few weeks ago, it showed members of the Occupy protests, then pointed out all the “big company” items these people were wearing or using. Whether or not I agreed with the Occupy protests, I have to admit, the pic irked me a bit. First, it proved a general ignorance of how the world works. You’d be hard pressed to look at a crowd, ANY crowd and not find items in the crowd produced by big business, that’s why their business is big, their products permeate everywhere. Second, I find it offensive to belittle anyone who is actually willing to go out on a limb and stand up for something they believe in, even if you don’t agree with the message. Go out and protest against them, tell your side, but belittling their message does no one any good. Note – racist/hate groups are my exception to this, belittle them with my blessing.
On that same note, a co-worker of mine said he believes that by protesting the banks, they are protesting capitalism, and as such, should be welcome to leave for a country where they practice socialism. First, a basic definition of capitalism from Websters:

an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.
In this world, our country certainly has the closest thing to real capitalism there is. But it is a far cry from true capitalism. Our government has dipped their greasy palms into everything they can. They regulate everything. They tax everything. They punish the overly successful businesses for being such. Then they give taxpayer money to the banks that crashed the entire economy because the government, the president even, encouraged them to practice business in a way that just wasn’t reasonable. So when the occupy Wall Street people protest greed, and government involvement in the banks, they are actually protesting in favor of true capitalism, not against it. Something to think about.

Finally, and most important, I think the Occupy Wall Street movement is a starting point. Hopefully, it can be the spark that starts a much bigger fire. If we let the spark go out, people will be that much more reluctant to get involved next time around, and the opportunity to effect real change in our government may be lost, and that would truly be a shame.

2 comments:

  1. Good recovery... you were about to lose me for a moment, but your point is on spot. Your co-worker is a simpleton. For people like your co-worker I suggest three movies:
    "Inside Job" narrated by Matt Damon, this movie is really an interview of both Private and Government main streamers who played apart in our economic demise. Minus several key players like "Bill Clinton". The information in the movie is dry; so for people like your co-worker they should have stimulants and snack and at least two intermissions.

    "Company Man" with Tommy Lee Jones, and Ben Affleck. This movie is based on a true story. You could say it based on many true stories that repeatly played out since the 1970s. When you watch this movie look pass the Hollywood Good vs. Evil, and sometimes Good triumphs. It's about selling out American Industry to Foreign Government or Foreign Industry for personal and political profit, but more about personal and corporate greed. I had another movie in mind, but for people like your co-worker whose attention isn't long enough to make it through an episode of Barney; I suggest...

    "Syriana" with George Clooney and Matt Damon. Your co-worker might pay attention to this movie if they think there is going to be a gun battle or knife fight. This movie is about "Big Business" corruption manipulating Goverment Policy. Use this link for the movies, and choose DVD version "putlocker.com" it is FREE.

    Good post all in all.
    In the Eighties and Nineties when the Socialist of U.S. started an all out war on the 2nd Amendment Rights; and the Liberal Media were mocking gun owners. We told them they were next. That the Freedom of Speech, and the Freedom of Press would be next... and here we are Government controlled Media, Government controlled Banking... etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It'll be interesting to see how "leadership" emerges from these Occupy protests. It seems each and every time I see someone "representing" a city on TV, they are protesting something different.

    Honestly though, I stopped paying attention to them when some of the local Denver protesters said they'd be staying in homeless shelters and abandoning tents downtown when the snowstorm hit. They want to protest wasteful spending, government's misappropriating funds and all sorts of financial issues, yet they want to take the cities resources by staying in homeless shelters while protesting. I feel this is backwards.

    ReplyDelete